The Scary Health Rant: An Acetaminophen-Asthma Link, Breastfeeding, and The H1N1 Shot

Acetaminophen and Asthma

And they wonder why some parents are reluctant to give their kids the swine flu vaccine...

After more than 20 years of being told to give children acetaminophen for fevers, sore throats and aches and pains we're now told that that very same drug may be linked to a higher risk of developing asthma. And that it could, in fact, possibly be the main reason for the huge increase in asthma rates in recent years.

And we're not just talking about the results of one study here, we're talking about 19 different studies, involving 425,000 subjects.

According to Mark FitzGerald, the UBC professor of respiratory medicine who co-authored the review looking at the results of 19 earlier studies, the results showed a clear cause and effect relationship between the use of acetaminophen (more commonly known by its brand name, Tylenol) and asthma: lower doses of the drug were associated with decreased risk and higher doses with an increased risk.

Although he went on, in the accepted and expected professorial manner, to qualify everything by stating that "This is not the kind of study that can establish cause and effect", the results of the studies seem quite clear. After all, every one of the 19 studies showed the exact same result.

As he points out, over the past two decades there has been a puzzling rise in asthma rates worldwide and it was, perhaps not coincidentally, about 20 years ago now that doctors started to recommend the use of acetaminophen instead of aspirin to treat children: "There was a change in practice and in the succeeding 20 years or so the prevalence of asthma has increased also".

And if something as seemingly innocuous and commonly used as acetaminophen can possibly be contributing to, if not causing, a significant rise in a condition as serious and widespread as asthma, then should we really be blindly trusting every other new drug and/or vaccine that doctors assure us to be safe?

More importantly, should we really be in a rush to test it out on our kids?

Let me be clear here, I'm not against the idea of people getting the H1N1 shot. In fact, I think those with weakened immune systems and underlying medical conditions should most definitely get it.

However, I am a bit nervous about giving my young son a brand new vaccine that has only been in existence for a few short months now (even if it is based on the same process and technology as the annual flu shots).

Obviously there are no immediate dangers or they wouldn't be using it, but it's important to keep in mind the fact that dozens of other drugs that have been pulled over the years also seemed safe at first.


I come by my reluctance to blindly trust the medical profession naturally. I was born into a world - a world called the 1960s - where the extremely messed-up, common-sense-lacking Canadian medical establishment was telling women, my mom included, that breastfeeding was a bad idea and that if you wanted your children to be truly healthy then you should be feeding them baby formula instead.

Well, we all know what an absolute load of nonsense that was, but millions of women believed it at the time because, well, the medical establishment had spoken and they must know what they're talking about, right?

Luckily my mom was one of the 30% or so of Canadian women at the time who used their common sense and ignored the illogical ravings of the medical practitioners of the day.

Have We Ever Steered You Wrong Before?

From leeches to bloodletting to eugenics to the promotion of baby formula over breastfeeding, the medical establishment has unintentionally pushed all sorts of nonsense on the public over the years, always with the exact same confidence that what they were doing was absolutely correct. But it wasn't.

The key word in that last paragraph, however, is "unintentionally". Because I'm in no way suggesting that the medical establishment has ever intentionally steered the public astray. But I am suggesting that they often get things totally wrong.

The point being that it shouldn't be such a surprise that so many parents are reluctant to give their kids a brand new vaccine that has just arrived out of an extremely short testing process. The fact is no one knows whether there could be unforeseen side effects down the line.

Drug Recalls

The list of drugs that have had to be recalled due to dangerous unforeseen side-effects is extremely long. From thalidomide and diethylstilbestrol back in the 1960s and 1970s to lumiracoxib (or Prexige), rimonabant (or Accomplia) and rofecoxib (or Vioxx) in recent years, many drugs have been approved for sale, only to show their true dangerous nature a few years later.

As for vaccines, up until 1999 most vaccines contained thiomersal, a mercury-based preservative. And who would ever want to give their kids mercury, no matter how small the amount?

Then there was the pertussis (or whooping cough) whole-cell vaccine that caused quite a (relatively) high rate of adverse reactions and deaths, until it was finally replaced in the 1990s by the much-safer acellular form of the vaccine.

To Be Inoculated or Not To Be Inoculated, That Is The Question

Personally, I've had all my basic shots and so has my son. And I'm obviously aware that if it weren't for vaccines millions of people would still be dying of polio, smallpox and other horrifically deadly diseases.

My point here is not to say new vaccines or drugs are necessarily dangerous, I'm just saying that no one knows whether they are, in fact, safe or not. We only find that out a few years, or decades, down the road.

So, if some people (like myself) are a little reluctant to give their kids this new H1N1 shot, perhaps it's simply because they're conscious of recent medical history and, therefore, sensibly a little hesitant.

No one wants their son or daughter to die of swine flu, of course, but neither do they want their kids to be guinea pigs for a brand new vaccine.

Based on recent history, I'd say that those who are cautiously suspicious are much more in touch with reality than those who hold an almost religious blind trust in the medical establishment and drug companies. A blind trust that, if you ask me, can only be described as naive.

Mike Cowie (Oredakedo)
Friday, November 13th, 2009


Now check out these other recent rants:


It's About Bloody Time: Canadian Support For Monarchy Drops Dramatically


The Canadian Justice System Rant: A System So Broken It's Criminal


We're #1: A More Positive Take On Canada's Dismal Environmental Record


Bitter and Bewildered: The Sad Plight of The Disillusioned Left-Wing Canadian Voter


Summer of Stupefaction: The Baffling Fight By Ordinary Americans To Defeat Healthcare Reform


Canada: Top Ten Things To Love and Hate


Fightback & Counterattack: Vatican Says Church Sex Abuse of Kids Not Really Pedophilia


The Great Anti-Canadian-Healthcare Fraudster Joins The Great American Healthcare Debate


An Open Letter To America Concerning The Hate-Filled Homophobes of The Religious Right


The War On Terror Charade: 14-Year-Old Terrorists and The Fight For Western Civilization


Imagine: A Common Sense Justice System That Frowns On Police Brutality


For more on Canadian politics visit the Politics: Canada page


For more on American politics visit the Politics: America page


And for lots more on politics of all types visit the Politics Homepage


MikesAndDislikes Home


There is a book I recommend reading, it's called " A Shot In The Dark ". If you can read it without crying ,and wanting to scream at the "Professional Medical Experts", then your a better man than I. Jenny McCarthy is my hero . Have you seen what is in these flu shots? You may as well go drink Hemlock . Get it over with. To inject an innocent child with this abhorrent cocktail , is in my opinion, criminal. Nothing less. Be informed, work out your decision . Look at the statistics, from both sides of the issue. I have been on the Front lines , enough , to see the effects of the MMR , to see for myself what can happen. One in 91 children now is Autistic. That ain't from bubblegum. I am sick of the Hype, the lies the lack of testing. These people that say all is well, are the same people that told us Thalidomide was safe, and Vioxx, and Tylenol and and and.......Be wise, err on the side of caution. I, am not afraid of the truth. You all have a mind, just use it.


This is a thoughtful piece. I remember as a child being among those who were subjected to the first vaccine (the Salk vaccine) against polio. That also had an element of experiment, just like the H1N1 vaccine, but fortunately since the 1950's people around the world have been spared the fate of many of my contemporaries who fell ill with polio and died, or were severely disabled as a result. I'm sure the science is never perfect, but vaccinations have saved countless numbers of chidren the world over. For example, in the past two decades the world has seen the eradication of the truly dreadful scourge of smallpox -- due to the smallpox vaccination being promoted and distributed through the World Health Organization. We all need to be both vigilant yet also sensible when any new medical breakthrough is promoted. Often, trust is warranted. D.M.

No evidence, and the jury has gone to sleep.

I have not yet heard any "convincing" evidence against getting the shot. The odds of dying from the H1N1 flu—also known as "hiny" (in Prince George of course), but not because that's where you get the shot—are far greater than the odds of getting seriously ill from the vaccine... at least at this point.
However, as you indicate so elegantly in your soft spoken manner, Mike, those who "know what's best for us," are not playing with a full deck. The evidence is not all in and the jury (that's us!) has gone to sleep. Only the future will tell us what the shot will do to our kids? Ummm... Is that the way we should test things like this?
You also make another good point, Mike: do not blindly trust the establishment (medical, religious, financial, academic or otherwise); do the research, make your own informed decision, stand up and be counted as one of the informed few. Make your mark on the world... or in the snow if yur from P.G.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Boballoo